CEO Total Pay
$3.8M
FY2025 Summary Compensation, above median
The CEO earned $3.8M in FY2025 against median worker pay of $173,214 · Depository Institutions.
Data updated August 2026
Subscribe to Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. CEO pay filing updates (RSS)
Answer first
According to the same FY2025 complete-filing cohort used on the rankings boards (CEO total, median worker, and ratio all present). Median worker pay is $173,214. Industry placement uses the FY2025 SIC-60 peer cohort (# 97 of 136, 29th percentile - below the industry median pay ratio). Figures come from Section 953(b) Dodd-Frank DEF 14A disclosures - not estimates. View all Depository Institutions companies.
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. CEO pay vs. every FY2025 complete filing
Total CEO compensation, the full national distribution, this company marked
$3,769,054 28th percentile higher than 28% of 1,423 companies
Each bar is a $2500K-wide band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source SEC DEF 14A Section 953(b) disclosures, PlainCEOPay extract · FY2025
CEO total pay ($3.8M) against pay ratio (22:1) for Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. (marked) and its 4 closest same-industry peers, against the Depository Institutions industry median on both axes.
Exclusive CEO-to-median-worker bands across 124 complete latest-FY filings in SIC 60. Segments sum to the peer set, not this company's compensation pillar.
A component-level pay breakdown is not reported in Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s structured SEC pay-ratio disclosure. See our methodology →
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s FY2025 ratio 22:1 ranks #97 of 136 Depository Institutions filers (29th percentile). the CEO earned 22× the median employee ($173,214) in FY2025.
At $173,214 median worker pay, the FLOOR stamp is near pay-parity territory under MID$ CEO total.
CEO Total Pay
$3.8M
FY2025 Summary Compensation, above median
Pay Ratio
22:1
Below typical
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s FY2025 ratio 22:1 ranks #97 of 136 Depository Institutions filers (29th percentile). The structured pay-ratio disclosure reports the total without line-item components. Depository Institutions (SIC 60) median ratio is 43:1 across 136 FY2025 filers; Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s $3.8M CEO total is above the $3.0M industry median CEO pay.
Dollar rank #1018 and ratio rank #1200 split - treat 22:1 as a disclosure, not a fairness score. Open Depository Institutions peers.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s FY2025 ratio 22:1 ranks #97 of 136 Depository Institutions filers (29th percentile).
ABS(ceo_total_comp) peers first, then a SIC pole and a stamp-branched guide - not a fixed Related strip. This page stamps FLOOR · MID$ · ELITE-MED.
ABS(ceo_total_comp) peer at $3.8M (Δ $7K lighter vs Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.); MODEST · PAR-MED vs this page's FLOOR · MID$ · ELITE-MED.
ABS(ceo_total_comp) peer at $3.8M (Δ $16K heavier vs Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.); MODEST · HIGH-MED vs this page's FLOOR · MID$ · ELITE-MED.
ABS(ceo_total_comp) peer at $3.8M (Δ $18K heavier vs Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.); FLOOR · ELITE-MED vs this page's FLOOR · MID$ · ELITE-MED.
ABS(ceo_total_comp) peer at $3.7M (Δ $20K lighter vs Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.); MODEST · PAR-MED vs this page's FLOOR · MID$ · ELITE-MED.
Red River Bancshares Inc stamps FLOOR · LIGHT nearest in-SIC by ABS(pay_ratio) to Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s FLOOR filing.
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s FY2025 package sits #1018 by CEO dollars and #1200 by ratio under MID$ · FLOOR.
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc.'s FLOOR stamp sits in the lower Item 402(u) band - start with how the ratio is disclosed before comparing peers.
Data currency: Executive compensation from SEC EDGAR DEF 14A proxy statements through fiscal year 2025, compiled and last refreshed August 2026. See our methodology for source dates and refresh cadence. Spot a figure that looks wrong? Report a correction.